To be fair, that’s in a completely different ballpark from it being a genocide.

And honestly, I don’t know enough about this to make a claim either way

I don’t think it’s a matter of “accepting” but rather it being mostly community maintained, and so languages with minimal communities get no moderation.

Even gen AI, despite how it has been used as a tool for the enrichment of the more privileged 0.1% as a tool of suppression of artists’ (and critics of technofascism’s) voices, is not really a harmful technology.

With enough copyright protections, and regulation of deep fakes, digital formats, and a bunch of other things, I could see gen AI being a valuable collaborator to creative output and workflows.

Hell, other than weapons, I find it hard to justify calling any technology inherently evil or nefarious. And even then, weapons have saved many innocent people’s lives against unjustified attacks, wild animals and other threats.

Still, if we don’t treat each technological invention with the right amount of cautiousness and care, we risk the deaths of, sometimes, even thousands or tens of thousands of people.

I’m from a so-called “3rd world dump” and not even, because our death squads aren’t as well-armed to kill civilians.

Then again, there may be a lot wrong with my country, but we definitely do not share America’s problems in the first place.

I’m mostly fine with OTCs being advertised. Like idk Tylenol double mega effectiveness or whatever.

But every country I’ve ever visited or lived in heavily restricts ads for more serious medal stuff, except for some reason the US.