The argument was about deterministic abstraction.
A bunch of devs can hardly be considered an abstraction layer imo.
My argument was that a C compiler is an abstraction tool that deterministically turns the description of a program (in the C language) into machine code. That way people don’t have to write machine code by hand.
Yes, but if you send the same promt to the same LLM n times, you’ll get n different versions of the same thing.
When compiling the same C code (for example) with the same compiler and the same settings n times, you’ll end up with n copies of exactly the same binary.
It’s basically like telling a junior dev to code something for you and then passing it off as your own work.
Would’t call that coding either.
I don’t know what to tell you other than that there’s probably something wrong with you.
640K ought to be enough for anybody.
While a lot of people die trough suicide, it’s not exactly good or helpful when an AI guides some of them trough the process and even encourages them to do it.
Tech companies and preventable controversies: name a more iconic duo.
vast majority of Internet traffic across the world is unencrypted.
In 2023 between 80% and 95% of web traffic was encryted. Unencrypted web traffic is getting pretty rare.
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2023/12/year-review-last-mile-encrypting-web
Your argument is based on the assumtion that AI “thinks” in the same way humans do. Which it does not, since it doesn’t think at all.
And being called a tool to generate code is borderline insulting tbh.