The drunk cyclists were deemed by police as likely to pose a "significant danger" as car drivers.
  • k0e3@lemmy.caEnglish
    3·
    1 day ago

    What even is the point in this comment? Why is it suddenly an either-or choice?

    • icelimit@lemmy.mlEnglish
      1·
      1 day ago

      Because we’re comparing legal consequences of dui and (the new consequences of) cycling-ui.

      • k0e3@lemmy.caEnglish
        1·
        1 day ago

        But you’re saying you’d rather have cycling-UI over DUI as if punishing the former would increase the latter.

        • icelimit@lemmy.mlEnglish
          1·
          24 hours ago

          Given the same “price”, the ‘rational consumer’ (of illegal activities) would choose the (seemingly) more valuable purchase (crime) - value here being time saved and convenience.