• mushroommunk@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Literally nothing, he wouldn’t have been able to do any of that without the board being, well, on board, and they chose a board member to temporarily replace him.

      • DraconicSun@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Colette Kress literally told him to stop putting too much emphasis on AI because it was ruining their finances. She got mansplaining from him as a result.

        • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Ruining their finances? They’ve never made as much profit. If they’re rewriting her history now, that means they must see an end to the bubble, because not long ago she saw more growth in AI coming this year and she’s been said to be responsible for nvidias massive success during the boom.

        • milbyte@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          Do some short term capitalism bullshit they collectively decited to do. when it falls apart scapegoat the CEO, and replace him with someone else from that same board that was “totally against that idea”. How many times have we seen this exact same song and dance?

          i guess intentions don’t exactly matter if they really deem AI unprofitable and wish to sell to gamers again then so be it, but consumers should understand that these people do not have any loyalties other than money, and thinking otherwise is delusional.