• Thoralf@discuss.familie-will.at
    link
    fedilink
    Deutsch
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    How much more evidence do we need until we finally understand that older men are the worst choice for leading positions because they have trouble to keep their pants up and tend to think with their penis?

    • Lyrl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Bush (both of them), Obama, Biden kept their pants up. But somehow Clinton and Trump got more widespread long-lasting supporters. (Also, neither Clinton nor Trump - and I’m guessing not Huang - waited until they were old to have affairs; it was a whole-adult-life problem, not an “old man” problem.) Seems to be a problem with the people choosing the men as leaders - there are moral men to choose from if the voters or board members or whatever humans are doing the selection wanted.

      • Kaligalis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I think, eunuchs actually did exist for that sole reason - to have people in clerk and advisor positions who definitely have no interest in intriguing or corruption to promote or secure the funding of their own bloodline.

        • Elevator7009@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 hours ago

          a reason to support the “childless cat ladies,” really, the gleefully childfree of all genders. More time to focus on state affairs/volunteering for the homeless/activism, since there is no obligation to or desire to have dependent children.