• hanke@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    2 days ago

    Not sure, but you might be confusing memory with storage?

    Pretty sure memory stays as speedy and keeps its capacity over time. Though the software we run on the devices seems to constantly grow, which gives an impression of devices being more sluggish. But in reality, it is the software that is less efficient.

    • NGram@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      Both can fail. Failing NAND flash (solid state storage) usually results in reallocated sectors or slower reading due to retrying reads on bad sectors. Slow read/write can also just be a symptom of a nearly full drive. Failing DDR# memory can cause software freezes, crashes, or other random behaviour because usually there’s no error correction at that level (ECC isn’t common for consumer devices). Lots of detectable errors (through ECC) can cause a slowdown as it needs to redo the read/write.

      • hanke@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah, but failing RAM don’t get slower or lose capacity. It just plain crashes, right?

        • NGram@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          If you ignore error correction, storage doesn’t get slower either.

          But I also forgot one scenario: the voltage required to get a certain memory frequency increases as the chip ages. At some point you’ll have to lower the frequency to use the chips with a safe voltage, which is literally a slow down.