Pope Leo XIV says AI systems should be “disarmed,” adding that humans “have the responsibility to guide, change and, when necessary, reject its applications.” In Friday’s Papal Address, Pope Leo encourages United Nations member states to “take concrete steps toward banning lethal autonomous weapons” during their meeting in Geneva next month.
The address reflects many of the ideas Pope Leo laid out in his first major papal document in May, which highlighted “safeguarding the human person in the time of artificial intelligence.” In line with his encyclical, Pope Leo tells participants that “Machines are tools, not persons,” and warns about the dangers of granting AI systems rights or legal personhood. “Decisions affecting human life, freedom, and the use of force must always remain subject to effective, informed, and responsible human oversight,” Pope Leo says.
In 2024, Pope Francis similarly called for a ban on autonomous weapons, saying, “No machine should ever choose to take the life of a human being.” AI has become a popular topic for Pope Leo, who suggests he chose his name because he must confront advances in the technology — similar to how Pope Leo XIII presided over the church at the forefront of the Industrial Revolution.
Pope Leo closes out his address by calling for international institutions to safeguard the common good from AI-related risks, along with “shared standards, independent oversight and clear mechanisms of accountability so that decisions concerning the development and use of AI can be examined, challenged when necessary, and accompanied by appropriate remedies for any harm caused.”

But corporations are people? They have more rights than women these days.
But corporations are people
That’s another concept that needs to cease to exist.
💯
They’re juridical entities,akin but not exactly people.
They still have rights and obligations but they’re not people in the strict sense, you cant incarcerate a corporation.
Unfortunately, even when they, as a group, decide to cause harm and suffering. Cheaper to pay legal fees for death and dismemberment than pay for recalls.
https://www.spokesman.com/stories/2008/oct/17/pinto-memo-its-cheaper-let-them-burn/
Cheaper to pay for less/worse healthcare which leads to more death and bankruptcy…
Cheaper to eliminate roles and replace them with contract positions which don’t have benefits leading to the same as above…
Almost like they can’t be held accountable.
And then if it’s attempted, they can just defer the judgements which harms the victims more…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xNo8Ve-Ej6U
Must be nice to be a person when it suits you and not a person when it suits you.
The thing is that on the other way it would be unjust to entities where no one is really responsible for it.
I disagree. The persons making AI are definitely tools.
Unless I misunderstood the statement.
Wrong, in the US the tool is never ever the problem.
Unless, I misunderstood the statement.
They are called ‘voters’ in the usa
“But AI doesn’t kill people, people do…”
So charge those people with war crimes!
We can’t do that, it was the AI’s fault!
Im not Happy about using AI for war,but that is because war exists, I’d like AI to be FOSS and accesible locally for everyone.
(sorry to be cynical, but…)
Heh, good luck.
thanks
Comment section seems a bit “euphoric” today. Lemmy, your reddit is showing.
Orange Bible when?
Everyone wants the Butlerian Jihad until the Butlerian Jihad is actually here.
Sounds like something an Ixian would say.
Call the llm it or this, something non-human, “this machine is wrong, check again or give more sources.” Ask them to use Sagan’s baloney detection kit and high levels of perry’s scheme of thinking to examine things, detect unfalsifiable things like the Invisible Dragon story.
Ai for war is not at all good idea 💀

Indeed.
Machines are not persons yet.
📙
I’m not Catholic but I might just be willing to convert
Marketing types must love you.
And I love them
I love cats if it helps
Applicable to all religions, and all religious people









