Pretty sure most users of Linux are not part of that and are going to keep on using Linux.
Edit: looks like the Fediverse instance this community is running on is using tainted code by the definitions used in your link. Will this ship also be jumped?
IDK but I have a lot of issues with that list anyway… they seem to have a strange definition of “permissive AI policy”, i.e. any mere mention of an AI service gets you on the list.
Example: OpenBSD and NetBSD both show as “permissive” on the list, even though both have publicly stated otherwise, just because there are one or two commits where someone (prominent dev) commented something like “I had help from Claude but you can’t tell, and I personally vouch for this and I know what I’m doing.”
According to the article imecth linked to in another comment it was already essentially meaningless.
I think the hivemind has already spoken, they are taking this to mean that the kernel is now vibe-coded and people are actively jumping ship.
The hivemind, aka a social media bubble.
Pretty sure most users of Linux are not part of that and are going to keep on using Linux.
Edit: looks like the Fediverse instance this community is running on is using tainted code by the definitions used in your link. Will this ship also be jumped?
IDK but I have a lot of issues with that list anyway… they seem to have a strange definition of “permissive AI policy”, i.e. any mere mention of an AI service gets you on the list.
Example: OpenBSD and NetBSD both show as “permissive” on the list, even though both have publicly stated otherwise, just because there are one or two commits where someone (prominent dev) commented something like “I had help from Claude but you can’t tell, and I personally vouch for this and I know what I’m doing.”