Why does Firefox have an ❌ next to “Insecure website setting”? It very much does warn you. There’s even an “HTTPS-only” setting that allows you to completely block insecure websites from loading.
Just because it admits when Brave faulters doesn’t mean it’s okay to lie about when other browsers are successful. In fact, if you cared about category X and both failed instead of only one, you’d be more inclined to ignore the category all together than remember one performed better.
It’s still obscuring results and obfuscating who’s behind this report. ~~Given Brave is the first browser listed (unless maybe it’s alphabetical) it seems pretty clear. ~~
Edit: it is, in fact, alphabetical. I rescind that criticism.
Why does Firefox have an ❌ next to “Insecure website setting”? It very much does warn you. There’s even an “HTTPS-only” setting that allows you to completely block insecure websites from loading.
I think it’s because you have to enable it first?
That’s my point. It should have a green ➖ next to it instead. An ❌ implies that the feature doesn’t exist.
It’s an ad for Brave. They are going to lie about their competition.
So we should be suspect about libre wolf clearly being ball handled by brave in this graph then?
But… It shows brave with an x too…
Just because it admits when Brave faulters doesn’t mean it’s okay to lie about when other browsers are successful. In fact, if you cared about category X and both failed instead of only one, you’d be more inclined to ignore the category all together than remember one performed better.
It’s still obscuring results and obfuscating who’s behind this report. ~~Given Brave is the first browser listed (unless maybe it’s alphabetical) it seems pretty clear. ~~
Edit: it is, in fact, alphabetical. I rescind that criticism.