Plenty of open source projects keep going on goodwill alone, with contributors putting in the hours and expecting nothing back. While others lean on outside support like cash, donated hardware, or someone else covering the hosting bill.

This kind of support rarely gets much attention, but these needs are some of the most foundational aspects of any project that’s serious about growing.

Gentoo falls in the second group. The source-based Linux distribution, built around the Portage package manager, runs largely on sponsored infrastructure, as it can only manage to maintain a few vital machines.

Sadly, many sponsors that had backed Gentoo all these years have decided to stop making contributions. The project is now looking for replacements and has put out a call for infrastructure sponsors.

Currently, its sponsors page lists names such as Oregon State University’s Open Source Lab, CDN77, HP, and Hetzner, but it may not yet reflect the dropouts.

There are five ways to help, as laid out on the sponsorship page of Gentoo’s wiki, with preference being given to supporters who share the project’s vision of software that respects choice and stays open to user-driven changes.

The first way is to accept donated machines for the project’s hosting locations in the US. They are not asking for much; anything good enough to handle server-focused tasks in today’s time is a good offering for them to use.

Next is Colocation, a type of physical hosting. The sponsor would provide rack space, power, and connectivity, while Gentoo finds the hardware to put in it. Capacity outside the US is their most urgent need at the moment, though offers from the US are welcome too.

Third are virtual machines, with a minimum of 2 vCPUs, 4GB of RAM, and 25GB of storage. The project says that it is leaning more on the cloud wherever it can, but many of its services are monolithic, and that Kubernetes would suit them poorly.

The fourth way is full-package hosted physical servers. The wiki gives two examples: a root server like the ones Hetzner offers, or a sponsor’s older or unused servers with Gentoo getting full remote access.

In that second case, the sponsor would still own and manage the hardware, whereas Gentoo would take care of the operating system and remote management, only asking for advance notice before any migration events.

The last is plain old money. Any donated funds would go toward paying for colocation and hosting.

A call to act

Gentoo is far from the only project that needs this kind of backing.

Take LVFS, the firmware update service for Linux. It leaned heavily on the Linux Foundation and Red Hat, with Framework and the Open Source Firmware Foundation pitching in $10,000 a year.

Then Lenovo and Dell joined at the Premier tier, at $100,000 a year each, along with HP and NVIDIA, who followed soon after. I would call that a win for LVFS and a sign that sponsors are out there for projects that go looking.

Maybe your organization has spare rack space, or you have money lying around and want it to do some good. Either way, someone has to host the servers behind projects like this, and Gentoo’s infrastructure team is available at infra@gentoo.org for any infrastructure sponsorship-related queries.

  • Mikelius@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I hate Google, but considering chromiumos is based on Gentoo, maybe it’s time they sacrifice some millions they made to Gentoo. Only pocket change right? Who am I kidding, selfish companies will stay selfish.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 minutes ago

      Sorry, they have invested so much in evil at this point… It’s really a sunk cost fallacy they know, but they can’t help themselves.

    • lavander@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 minutes ago

      They are moving away from chrome os to android. See the announcement of googlebook (not Chromebook, googlebook, great branding BTW)

  • Shimitar@downonthestreet.eu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I have been donating for many years. Small amounts surely, but it’s the least that you can do for such a project like Gentoo.

    It might be niche and pretty peculiar, but it’s unique and probably the truly most open Linux out there. And also, pretty important, zero drama.

    Also one of the few alternatives that let you freely choose if you want/need to use systemd network manager Wayland or whatever tech stack you prefer. Without holy wars, stupid preconception or fussiness.

    • nyan@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      And also, pretty important, zero drama.

      Not entirely true. The dev mailing list has periodic drama spasms. It just doesn’t tend to spread beyond that.

      • Imnebuddy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        For one, it is largely responsible for supporting and maintaining OpenRC on Linux, and is often the go-to-distro that other distros piggyback off its OpenRC configs and scripts.

        Being probably the biggest source-based distribution, it provides invaluable work on developing a system which can be compiled from source that other distro maintainers can look to for guidance.

        Portage is also one of the best package managers I have used. It takes into account packages that need to be rebuilt when build dependencies also update. On Arch Linux, I sometimes have to manually reinstall a package like qt6ct when KDE dependencies update. Portage takes care of this automatically when doing a deep update.

        In a time when many dystopian laws and surveillance tools like age verification and facial recognition are being enforced, we do not have many distros left that could provide security and privacy measures to bypass these issues by supporting alternative tools. Tools like systemd, which has merged the pull request to include a birth date field in preparation for age verification, tend to develop a monopoly on most distros because of the limited capacity and free time developers have to support alternatives while trying to keep up with other projects. I’m not trying to bash systemd, though, but the fact it is the most dominant init system on most major distros creates a problem for users, especially activists and journalists, who need to protect their identity in this increasingly threatening and dangerous capitalist hellscape.

        Gentoo supports many, many packages. It provides the ability to create a system using various combination of tools coming from the GNU, BSD, systemd, and other families. While other distros like Arch may also provide some alternatives, not many distros come close to scale that Gentoo offers. If Gentoo cannot survive, it would be a massive blow to FOSS and our technological sovereignty overall.

      • distal@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Gentoo is one of those distros that actually gets people to learn about their compuers, and as someoneelse has said the wiki is great. tmk a few innovations from the Gentoo “ecosystem” like features of init systems make it into other distros, similar to Arch.

        • comrademiao@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          36 minutes ago

          You can learn about Linux and computers without having to compile everything. I’m sure Gentoo is important but your answer is negligent. Does using Fedora make me less knowledgeable? This assume if I do not HAVE to compile then I must be too dumb to learn Linux by reading voluntarily.

          • distal@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            17 minutes ago

            Your answer does not follow since I did not say that compiling is what makes people knowledgeable. Gentoo isn’t merely compiling. Binpkg repos exist and suffice for a lot of users.

            Gentoo is unique in that it explicitly gives you maximum freedom in designing your experience, at the same time it implicitly forces you to learn since there is no straight forward process of installing the OS and designing/tweaking your setup later on. If you mess up, you can’t just simply do a reinstall or go back any other way willy nilly (in most cases), you have to do the software equivalent of an open heart surgery. Going from Debian to Gentoo has a lot of friction associated with it.

            Portage makes you read updates, and is very clear about issues. At every turn in Gentoo there are opportunities to learn. This comes at the expense of comfort, but it pays in other ways. You are better off understanding Gentoo as an exercise in minimalism.

            Just as your initial assumption does not follow, neither does your suggestion that I’m implying users of other distros and OSes can’t become knowledgeable.

            Have you ever even tried Gentoo or invested time to understand it?

      • z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Gentoo is probably the most customizable of the Linux distros, as you can compile from source, adjust C compiler flags to optimize application speed, remove compiler level features if you don’t want/need them, and they support a LOT of computer architectures. Not to mention the Gentoo Wiki is a gem of documentation that surpasses (imho) even the Arch Wiki.

        It’s potentially the best Linux distro for tinkerers up there with Arch Linux and NixOS.

          • z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Yeah, fair. Again, it’s imho, that the Gentoo wiki still surpasses the Arch wiki (emphasis on humble opinion).

            All that considered, it would be a considerable tragedy to lose Gentoo as a distribution in the Linux ecosystem. It offers something no other Linux distro does. Namely complete customization surpassed only by LFS (i.e. Linux From Scratch).

            On a bit of a tangent, I personally think the recent popularity of AI points to not the superiority of AI/LLM utility, but rather to the enshittefication of modern search/documentation.

            I think the Gentoo wiki, for all its flaws, is still a genuinely important part of the online documentation of how everything works. Sure, it’s terse, its verbose. But after the summary, don’t you eventually come to the thought “sure, but why? Why run that command? What does that mean? What does that ultimately do?” I’m not saying the Gentoo wiki answers this (ultimately this boils down to a CS/Math question), but still, the deeper question and the slightly deeper answer matters. It’s important that is documented, publicly somewhere. It is important you shouldn’t have to query an LLM to get that answer. Any wiki is better than some corporately gate kept LLM answer.

            Hence, why I still think while imperfect, the Gentoo wiki is important to maintain.

            It is my hope, that while perhaps you may not agree with my humble opinion, that you might at least sympathize with my view.

  • Clippy@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    So Gentoo needs more money but Omarchy gets millions, maybe they should be sponsoring Gentoo instead.