Donald Trump’s bruising return to the White House has sent many longtime foreign allies scrambling to get their distance, and according to a new piece from The Atlantic, that distance will last long after Trump is gone.

Trump’s second term as president has been marked by notable and widespread disrespect toward nations once seen as close U.S. allies. Between his attempts to level massive tariffs against nearly every nation in the world and his frequent breaches of diplomatic norms, Trump has created a hostile global environment in which allies no longer feel safe trusting in the stability of the U.S.

In a new piece for The Atlantic on Tuesday, staff writer Vivian Salama argued that this new dynamic, in which the nations of the world are working to establish a safe distance from the U.S., is bound to become the new normal for years to come, even after Trump leaves office and is potentially replaced by a more traditional, dependable administration.

  • QueenHawlSera@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I hope the entire world turns its back on America.

    If they can do this to me, one of its own citizens, imagine what they’ll do to you.

    • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      25
      ·
      17 hours ago

      because I’ve been hurt I want to hurt them

      gee, that sounds eerily familiar. where have I heard that mentality before I wonder…

        • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          13 hours ago

          let’s break it down into the three statements.

          1. I hope the entire world turns its back on America.

          2. If they can do this to me, one of its own citizens,

          3. imagine what they’ll do to you.

          Statement 2 has identified them and implies that statement 1 has happened to them.

          Statement 2 has a qualifier, they are a citizen of the US.

          Statement 1 expresses they hope the world turns their back on the US like they have implied happened to them in statement 2.

          Statement 3 is a direct threat to you that the US will force statement 1 on you just like them in statement 2.

          when you reduce it down, logically, they are saying: “I hope Americans are hurt because Americans hurt me, and they’ll hurt you like they hurt me, so hurt them first because I want them to be hurt like they hurt me.”

          this is logic 101 shit.