• DFX4509B@lemmy.wtfOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Not gonna matter when apps and services start blocking Linux, or even worse, should this shit creep up the chain to the ISP level and should ISPs start requiring an Apple, Google, or MS OS just to get online to begin with.

    • Maiq@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 hours ago

      My fear is that personal devices will be super expensive and out of reach for most people and the only devices available will be subscription run and cloud served only. Enfeebled portable device and no power to own or even run anything locally. Locked in! No way out.

      That is why the tech bros are going all in on the datacenters and burning books. Setting fire to the bridge as they cross.

      Ai is just the excuse and the manufactured scarcity of hardware is the weapon that they hope to use to hold us hostage.

    • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      15 hours ago

      That’s when I buy a LoRa array and a ham license.

      The thing about the Internet is that anyone can be an ISP and any devices can be networked. If consumer ISPs become gatekeepers, we can network without them. And then we can tunnel encrypted data over the official devices that can’t be fully locked down.

      • MangoCats@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        14 hours ago

        when I buy a LoRa array and a ham license.

        And talk to who? You (and I) and the 0.001% can ham it up, but the rest of the world will be living in a different bubble.

        • dihutenosa@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Talk to like-minded people - like you and me here, sitting on Fediverse, discussing tech. Help set family and friends up with access. That’s what I do today with my Matrix server.

          The rest of the world rarely have anything good to say.

        • Random_Character_A@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Well Meshcore only recently arrived here, but you can still reach Latvia from southern Finland. Not completely effortlessly though.

        • Damage@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 hours ago

          And talk to who? You (and I) and the 0.001% can ham it up, but the rest of the world will be living in a different bubble.

          And just talk btw, no bandwidth for anything else

      • unitedwithme@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        14 hours ago

        LoRaWAN and HaLOW WiFi don’t need HAM licenses unless you’re just being prepared!

        I’m looking to setup Meshcore myself for a 900MHz setup.

        • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Yeah; the HAM is a “next step” thing for if they lock down the microwave band somehow.

          But also, a HAM license is required to operate LoRa at higher power broadcast, at least in my country. At under 10km range low bandwidth, it isn’t currently needed.

          • unitedwithme@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            OK gotcha. I thought regulations were pretty standard across Europe and North America. I didn’t realize LoRa itself could get beyond 10km but that’s maybe bc I’ve been looking at consumer grade stuff.

      • DFX4509B@lemmy.wtfOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        14 hours ago

        What’s stopping the FCC or your country’s equivalent from locking down HAM regulations?

        • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          14 hours ago

          That’s an interesting one actually. If they licked down HAM regulations, they’d lose their relief valve/last line of defense.

          It’s not that some idiotic government couldn’t do it, but if they did then they’d lose what control they currently have AND be totally screwed of anything went wrong.

          • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            12 hours ago

            You’re not making a single point for why trump wouldn’t do this on a whim because some corporate asshole smiled at him and praised him.

      • Dharma Curious (he/him)@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        … You can just be your own ISP? Is that, like, an actual thing one can do, or more a last ditch hypothetical thing that’s technically possible, but realistically not doable?

        • MangoCats@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Yeah, just like you can run your own SMTP service and exchange e-mail, or… could 25 years ago before the big players froze all the small players out of the big network pool. You can set up your own internet, your own e-mail network, etc. but the Facebooks, Whats Apps, Apples and Googles of the world will lock your internet out of their internet.

          • fozid@lem.radiantfig.fyi
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 hours ago

            But that’s a good thing and the whole point? You can use the big tech internet and all their services, or you can use the non big tech internet and not use their services.