A man ahead of his time. source

  • Rothe@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    It is not undisputed. We have no contemporary evidence of his existence, but scholars agree on a consensus that he most likely existed, based on a range of secondary conjectural evidence.

    It cannot be undisputed though, since we have no certainty, and the scholars involved in the consensus are freely admitting to that.