sanitation@lemmy.today to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 12 days agoAI agents aren’t legally responsible for any harm that they cause, experts say. So who is?www.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square121linkfedilinkarrow-up1399arrow-down17
arrow-up1392arrow-down1external-linkAI agents aren’t legally responsible for any harm that they cause, experts say. So who is?www.theguardian.comsanitation@lemmy.today to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 12 days agomessage-square121linkfedilink
minus-squarerichmondez@lemdro.idlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·9 days agoWhat I’m saying is the way it’s marketed to be used is much closer to the wrong way and it’s far less of a productivity enhancer when used how it really should be and relies on having a lot more professional level IT skills.
minus-squareLilBobbyTables@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·9 days agoWhat marketing are you talking about? Every piece of marketing I’ve seen always has disclaimers saying things like “Copilot can be wrong, always check the output”.
What I’m saying is the way it’s marketed to be used is much closer to the wrong way and it’s far less of a productivity enhancer when used how it really should be and relies on having a lot more professional level IT skills.
What marketing are you talking about?
Every piece of marketing I’ve seen always has disclaimers saying things like “Copilot can be wrong, always check the output”.