• badgermurphy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      One of the companies that gets hacked is eventually going to get mad and legal about it, though. A court is then going to decide who, if anyone, is liable when someone’s AI performs actions that amount to a crime. Based on their decision, either the business costs of running these types of AI models will rise dramatically, or “the AI did it” will become the ultimate “get out of jail free” card.

      • The Anti-AI Leader@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        No I absolutely agree with you, I just don’t think they will get away with saying ‘it’s the AI’s fault’ regardless of whoever eventually gets a lawsuit against them. I just don’t. If they use that defence and it does end up working, then I’ve lost all hope in humanity

          • badgermurphy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Thing is, the victims of the hacks are big companies with money and lawyers, too. Additionally, a legal landscape where hacking is not illegal when done with AI would be much more difficult or even impossible to conduct business in, so the entirety of the business world will have a stake in that legal outcome.

            • Talcosis@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              In an age of business consolidation and vertical integration, I think you’re going to have a split. Big businesses on the oligarch level, these hacks become cost of doing business/future conflict analogous to nation-states, while the smaller businesses are effectively cannibalized, or forced to sell to their local big business conglomerate asap before their shit is outright stolen.