• non_burglar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’m not really sure what you’re getting at. The blockchain is a good mechanism to maintain a source of truth that is inspectable and verifiable by anyone. It would only serve to certify that official counts can’t be tampered with in certain ways.

    But it doesn’t replace the whole democratic voting process. It doesn’t protect against coercive voting, for instance.

    My point originally was that blockchain can be of use to us, but tech bros ruined its rep. Same with AI. I’ve been waiting for routers with ai-powered (really, just machine learning) firewalls that can adapt rules to environments. But instead of that, everyone is obsessed with generative stuff that isnt very good.

    • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah I hear you, but the 51% attack exists. Like if you use paper ballots, you’re safer and it consumes less energy. There is just nothing better by using a blockchain, and paper ballots (for example) can be verified by anyone, the blockchain not so much.