That might be true for someone whose brain matured in a world without AI, those who graduated high school and/or college without ever using an LLM, but that’s not whom I was referring to.
Nah, these are Gen A studies and pre school. But it’s giving insight into tailend Z. Also giving insight to older generations failing in attention-span and critical thought/attention. Like self-induced cognitive stagnation. Oversaturation of mental disorder diagnosis due to their broadening grey area, but sleep deprivation, favouring dopamine over the other “happy” releases. Especially in males that have less biological releases of oxytocin.
Ugh, that didn’t even make sense to me reading it back. I’ll try find a public breakdown of one but it means I gotta… deeo hreath… search engine “scientific sources”…
Edit: Nope. Clickticles of opinionated bullshit and one public paper that’s had 138 citations in under a year. Which would be great if academia worked that well in its sharing of knowledge, but it’s suspiciously too many.
I’m talking about the long-term effects of AI on Gen B.
As in members of future generations who will eventually spend their entire lives cognitively surrendered to AI, not just a portion of their later life.
Absent a time machine, there literally cannot be studies on that yet.
That might be true for someone whose brain matured in a world without AI, those who graduated high school and/or college without ever using an LLM, but that’s not whom I was referring to.
Nah, these are Gen A studies and pre school. But it’s giving insight into tailend Z. Also giving insight to older generations failing in attention-span and critical thought/attention. Like self-induced cognitive stagnation. Oversaturation of mental disorder diagnosis due to their broadening grey area, but sleep deprivation, favouring dopamine over the other “happy” releases. Especially in males that have less biological releases of oxytocin.
Ugh, that didn’t even make sense to me reading it back. I’ll try find a public breakdown of one but it means I gotta… deeo hreath… search engine “scientific sources”…
Edit: Nope. Clickticles of opinionated bullshit and one public paper that’s had 138 citations in under a year. Which would be great if academia worked that well in its sharing of knowledge, but it’s suspiciously too many.
My dude.
I’m talking about the long-term effects of AI on Gen B.
As in members of future generations who will eventually spend their entire lives cognitively surrendered to AI, not just a portion of their later life.
Absent a time machine, there literally cannot be studies on that yet.
Oh, so like extra fucked than currently? Yeah, that makes sense and lines up with what’s currently being observed now—with scientific model, no less.
Here’s the best part; climate change is only just now scratching its way in years and years after it was identified as inevitable.
Good times ahead.