Right, but the question of “what’s the catch” frames it as a bad thing, so it’s not incorrect to assume that the answer is a bad thing, especially if the answer doesn’t frame it as a good thing
But I’m just arguing semantics, and nothing I said actually matters.
How is that bad news? That’s how strikes work.
They didn’t say it’s bad news
They were asking what the bad news is, though.
Sometimes there is no bad news but an explanation.
Right, but the question of “what’s the catch” frames it as a bad thing, so it’s not incorrect to assume that the answer is a bad thing, especially if the answer doesn’t frame it as a good thing
But I’m just arguing semantics, and nothing I said actually matters.
I’m fine with there being no catch and everybody gaining. They shouldn’t have to strike for it though.
well otherwise they could just wait it out