• TechLich@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Why does this have so many names?

    Some stuff calls it bonded, sometimes it’s teamed, sometimes LAGed or aggregated or bundled or link channelled or ethertrunked or smartgrouped or Multi-link trunked etc. etc.

    • LurkingLuddite@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      No idea! If I had to guess, the weird ones come from marketing and not engineering. “Bonded” has been a term for a looooong time, not that I actually remember/know the history of it.

      I’m sure some of the things you cited try to make up for deficiencies vs basic bonding, but networking can only get so complicated until you hit higher networking layers.

      • TechLich@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Yeah. Wikipedia calls it “link aggregation” and the standard is IEEE 802.1AX which also calls it that and the protocol LACP. I think the real reason for so many names is that the standard wasn’t developed until later so everyone built their own competing incompatible implementations with different names and it was a mess for years.

        Linux implemented it with the Linux bonding driver and switch manufactures made up their own proprietary extensions for it but the standard didn’t become a thing until like 2000. Seems like “teaming” is one of the most popular names for it.