fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 4 days agoLmaomander.xyzimagemessage-square268linkfedilinkarrow-up1803arrow-down110
arrow-up1793arrow-down1imageLmaomander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 4 days agomessage-square268linkfedilink
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoYes. Those are the book’s arguments. A counter-counter argument is a repeat of the same argument.
minus-squareericwdhs@discuss.onlinelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoAh, never read the books. Just figured I needed to expand my reasoning.
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoNothing wrong with some home grown logical analysis. That you are so close to the book does you credit.
Yes. Those are the book’s arguments. A counter-counter argument is a repeat of the same argument.
Ah, never read the books. Just figured I needed to expand my reasoning.
Nothing wrong with some home grown logical analysis. That you are so close to the book does you credit.