“kiss me, I’m so pretty”
- I preferred the old one. Think it was clearer what it referred to for people not familiar with the logo.  - I like the old one because I like the W3C, but when you see it you do get the impression that they were important in 1995 and probably haven’t done anything since. - I’m with you. I don’t love the new one, but it’s an improvement. 
 
- Yep. “Abstract” is not what you want for brand iconography. - I agree, though Nike would not 
- I disagree that the new one is too abstract. The w³ part is pretty pronounced, and then there’s design elements that reminds me of surfing. - No amount of trying has led to me seeing a w in that logo. Their design statement in the linked article specifically calls out that the logo is intentionally abstract. - I guess human perception is very subjective. To me the W3 is very obvious, but I have a hard time seeing a penis. - i can definitely see the 3 and also have a hard time seeing a penis, but whether i’ll see the w depends on the time of day 
 
 
 
 
- this is slightly vertically overstretched - actual logo: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:W3C®_Icon.svg 
 
 
- Looks like a hanging nut-sack if you turn your head.  - a hanging sack and a cork screw penis! 
- nah that’s a seahorse mermaid seathing 
- Looks like a penis looking back for a butt picture. 
 
- Double the TIL: W3C’s in charge of the ActivityPub standard 
- “Not every change is a change for the better” is especially valid in the logo design area. - And: Don’t they have real problems where they could have spent time and effort on instead? 
 
- Corkscrew penis - You see what you ‘want’ to see. =) - This comment sections is one of the weirder moments I’ve seen on Lemmy. 
 
 
- Experts in web technologies, but evidently not in graphic design. 
- looks like shit. i mean literally - Hahahahahah a turd with a fly landing on it 
 
- I like this one. Positive change in my opinion. :) 
- All I can see is two wailords humping eachother. Love is in the air. 
- I’m reminded of laundry detergent for some reason. 
- Reminds me of an old Warner bros logo 
- <3 
- The consortium clearly has too much money. 










