• r1veRRR@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Is this a good time to mention that animal ag is the most wasteful form of food we have? Further, consider capitalism and western rich countries. If the choice is between feedin poor people and feeding cows, what choice will the money make?

  • Agent641@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Most chemical fertilizer is synthesised from LNG.

    The two biggest exporters are Russia (sanctioned) and Qatar (all plants shut down)

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    ·
    11 hours ago

    A lot of dreamers here who never actually tried to grow something. A lot of YouTube video knowledge but no practical experience.

    Its damn difficult to grow your own food. I think buying canned goods and storing them is the best option for almost everyone instead of trying to grow your own.

    • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Yeah, my peppers got too much calcium and had black ends. Cucumbers got too yellow. Cabbage worked fine, but I fucking hate cabbage. Beans were seriously lacking. Shit certainly isn’t easy, and it’s way to easy to think, hey, I can do this no problem!

    • Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Buying dry food is probably better than canned. It’s lighter, stores for longer, and is much more compact.

        • Agent641@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          Rice, lentils, peas, beans, wheat berries, barley, oats, etc. But if you buy in large bulk (which you should do for the cost savings), you should repack the goods into smaller individually sealed containers. Because a 25kg bag of rice, once opened, will take a small family all year to get through, and having an open bag of rice attracts rodents, weevils, moisture, mould and dust. Pack it down into half kilo or 1kg containers, ideally vacuum sealed or with some other preventative treatment. Then only open 1 container at a time.

          This is good advice not just for building resilience against food cost shocks, but just generally good practice for saving money by buying in bulk and repacking yourself. Around here,a 25kg bag of rice costs me about $40, but buying 25kgs of rice in individual kilo bags at the supermarket costs $3.50 per kilogram for the cheap stuff, or $7.50 for the premium stuff ($88 or $188 respectively for 25kg worth)

      • Auth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        ok you can stay away from the garden and take a more motivational role

    • dejova281@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      The best is community roles in a collective. If you try to do everything yourself you’ll fail but in specializing you’ll succeed. For produce, one neighbor specializes in tomatoes, the other cucumber, the other onions, etc etc… that’s how human society survived in tough times and that’s actually as a species how we’re supposed to operate. As a community. Another reason why everyone is so dang lonely and depressed. Anyways, I digress…

    • hydroxycotton@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      10 hours ago

      As someone who has been trying to grow tomatoes in containers for about 10 years, I can confirm that it really is difficult. It took me about 5 years to achieve fairly consistent results and get the hang of properly amending the soil, planting correctly, watering, pruning etc. And I still have years where the production is really low, largely due to fungal diseases.

      • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        8 hours ago

        see what you should have done is just toss some rotten ones onto your driveway or behind the shed and ignored them and next year you’d have had the biggest baddest bitchingest tomato plants you’d ever seen

      • CentipedeFarrier@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Not wanting to add complexity or anything but have you considered trying a deep water culture (DWC) hydroponic system? That’s all a fancy way to say a dark colored large 5-ish gallon bucket of water with specific hydroponic nutrients dissolved in the water (I use a generic balanced powder and it works nicely) and an air pump to keep the water from going stagnant. As long as you keep the air pump dry, you can do the whole thing outside without issue. I hang mine under a plastic camera guard and it works nicely.

        I’m terrible at growing things in dirt because dirt remembers what you did to it (holds salts and nutrient excess unless you flush the soil), but hydroponics is a totally different thing. You can just toss the water and give it new when it starts showing signs of nutrient deficiency/toxicity. The roots end up massive and healthy and everything grows faster since there’s zero resistance in the growth medium. Just sucking up everything they can. Tho since the typical advice is to just completely toss the water at least weekly once it’s grown up (great for outside gardens or houseplants after the tomato buckets), you usually don’t end up with imbalances like that at all.

        Proper care of a hydro system makes for a bountiful harvest most years, and if you want, you can very easily keep a tomato clone over winter to keep some smaller amount of production going. Hydro works very well inside because you don’t bring most of the bugs you would with a dirt pot.

        Throw like 4 standard screw-in daylight bulbs of 60+watt-equivalent leds and you’ve got a grow space. No fancy expensive nonsense required.

      • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        10 hours ago

        We planted tomatoes on the backyard last year and we drowned in them, kilos and kilos of the stuff

        It also would’ve been a lot cheaper to get the same amount from the grocery store 😅

      • 1984@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Yeah. I have the largest respect for people who manage to get that far. It really is not easy.

    • morto@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      I grow a lot of stuff in a relatively small space. Sometimes I have to give stuff away because it’s too much for me. Maybe living in a tropical region helps? or maybe because I grow mostly native stuff that needs near to zero care.

      • FeatherConstrictor@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Living in a tropical region definitely helps. Up north, the selection is difficult. Where and when you plant different items is really important, since you can very easily kill the plant if you plant it too early or late

        • morto@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          That’s interesting to know. I never paid attention to timing when planting. We can plant most things in any season without much difference around here. Sometimes, things grow “spontaneously”, like the papaya tree that appeared last year and is already mature and giving fruits. Looks like I’m playing real-life stardew valley in easy mode >.<

      • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        LOL yeah. Stuff actually grows in tropical regions! :p

        I’m happy for you there. (Although I imagine pest control gets interesting haha)

        Southwestern U.S desert? Yeah, another story. Hydroponics are basically the best bet for your typical suburbia-dweller, I think.

        • morto@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Indeed, I have some trouble with pests, especially with the guava tree, but I’ve been using the technique of covering the young fruits in clothing bags so that pests can’t access them, and it’ has been effective so far. Needs a bit of work, but it’s cheap and doesn’t need using any chemicals. Sometimes, a naughty possum comes and takes something away, but it’s not so frequent, so I let them take their share lol. I once planted a broccoli that was growing so big and nice-looking, but had it suddenly disappear, eaten by a group of caterpillars.

          But I simply avoid the things that attracted pests and favor the ones that grow without much need of maintenance, like acerola, cassava, some pumpkins, passion fruits, some wild grape-like fruits, and so on. My backyard looks like an abandoned house with the wilds taking over, i admit, but well, I like it that way…

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Good thing I have a couple of acquaintances that have small farms and produce, so if shit goes downhill, I know where to offer my labor

  • Coleslaw4145@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Good thing my country exports 90% of its agricultural produce, so if we start getting hungry then we’ll just export a bit less.

    (We learned the hard way a long time ago when we ran out of potatoes.)

    • Viper_NZ@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Ireland was exporting food during the potato famine.

      Don’t assume your food won’t continue to be sold overseas if the growers/wholesalers can make more money that way.

      • Coleslaw4145@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Ireland was exporting food during the potato famine.

        *Britian was exporting food from Ireland during the famine.

        • Qwel@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Regardless of nationality, don’t expect your billionaire overlord to have ethics if it comes at the cost of a 0.7% income loss

          • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            No, you have to expect your government to do that, which is why almost the entire world is not hyper capitalist choochoo trains

  • lumpenproletariat@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    Damn, imagine if we hadn’t depleted our soils of nutrients through unsustainable agricultural practices requiring us to pump unsustainable chemical fertilisers into the ground.

    Combined with reducing the half a years supply of food per person that we waste per person each year. And using local native species instead of unsuitable foreign crops, we wouldn’t have to worry about any of that right now.

    Oh well, now millions of the global south get to starve to death as we steal purchase their dwindling crops. Modern society is the best thing ever and we should make no effort to change it.

    • fullsquare@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 minutes ago

      without synthetic nitrogen fertilizer there’s only enough reactive nitrogen going around for something like 1-1.5B people. yea mate very sustainable to retvrn to traditional farming and starve 80% of the planet in the process

    • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Ehh… We kinda missed the boat on that by like a hundred years. Even before the Haber process allowed us to allocate ammonia chemically, we had started to worse and worse famine pop up globally. We just have more people on earth than the natural nitrogen cycle can support through agricultural means.

    • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      whatever land you can take.

      some cities have programs that allocate park or unused land for community gardens. some even give you a small budget to build infrastructure like beds or buying dirt.

      grow staple foods that have long storage life: squash, pumpkins, carrots, rutabaga, potatoes. these can stay on your shelf for 3-8 months if stored properly. personally I have about 12 (3-5lbs each) spaghetti squash sitting since harvest in November that will be fine until about August.

      secondary are things you can freeze or dry: squash, peppers, peas, green beans, Lima beans, kidney beans, cabbage, beets. I dry most of these and toss them into soups and ramen.

      tertiary are foods you can process and preserved through canning, drying, or freezing: tomatoes (sauce or breaded), okra (breaded), etc…

      your diet will change, but you’ll feel good about what you’re cooking because you grew it.

      also, stay away from petroleum based fertilizers. if you add too much or too often you can burn your soil out and kill your crop. if you used naturally derived fertilizers you don’t have to be as careful.

      good luck!

      • HasturInYellow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Plant the 3 sisters (beans, corn, squash/pumpkin) together in a small area to maximize shelf stable production. You will need to do a small amount of research on planting times but the times are fast approaching.

        • 8oow3291d@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          You will need to do a small amount of research on planting times

          And climate zone. There are many places where it is too cold.

      • trackball_fetish@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Yeah I get that, what I’m saying is most of us can’t afford land, let alone a house. Cool if you can but I’m not lucky.

        • jefferyjefferson@lemmy.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Yes, it’s a shame how the system is designed to trap people into paying rent so they never save enough to own property.

  • smh@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    11 hours ago

    My partner and I are in conflict about food storage. I buy beans, pasta, and jarred foods when I’m stressed. He doesn’t like sacrificing storage space and I think just sees it as clutter.

    Anyways, I’m going to pick up more pasta, pasta sauce, and canned soup. Boxed macaroni and cheese. Stuff I know we’ll cycle through and doesn’t need much effort to cook because I know when things get bad I won’t want to brain much.

    Oh! LPT: textured vegetable protein is shelf stable dried soy protein and you can rehydrate it to add a ground beefy texture to things, like macaroni and cheese or pasta sauce.

      • smh@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I don’t think I’m trying to over stock. It’s things like buying more pasta when we’re down to 5 boxes instead of 0. We go through it, we just disagree on how much we should keep on hand.

        So far, the trick has been to keep the backlog out of sight and refill the main cupboard as needed. Like, he knows I keep extra, but he doesn’t look for himself because it’s in the low-down awkward corner cupboard.

        I guess I’d rather stress-buy pasta than gacha toys or another multitool or something, and I’m stressed for various reasons my therapist knows about.

    • cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Personally I think it’s worth a little space to have peace of mind. Also depending on where you live having a few week supply of food and drinking water in storage is generally recommended in case of a natural disaster.

      That said, if you’re in a western countries that produces most of its own food you’ll probably be fine. Those countries produce such an incredibly surplus that much of it gets diverted towards animal agriculture. If you can afford meat and dairy now you’ll probably be able to afford rice and beans if prices rise.

    • Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It’s easy to go overboard and make silly choices, but it’s also easy to plan a good contingency. I keep 1 year of dried food and 3 months of canned / jarred / frozen food. Any more than that and it gets wasteful for me. I have backup grid-independent solar power, and I also keep a small veggie garden going most of the year.

      I like to re-pack my dried foods into emptied, washed, and dried PET bottles, because they store better. I use 1L Waterford’s bottles because their shape is perfect for maximizing storage and stack ability. I repack large bags of dried food into these with oxygen absorbers, and packed this way, rice, lentils, wheat berries, and barley will last 20 years. Rolled oats will last a couple years. Sugar and salt will last indefinitely. Scaling them down to 1L individual volumes means you can crack one without introducing contaminants to the others

      Keeping a rigid system of labelling, inspecting and rotating your goods is as important as having them in the firstvplace

      • smh@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I’m still in the “mark expiration year in big marker” stage of rotating food, but that’s been easy enough to keep up with.

        Sadly, my condo doesn’t allow vegetable gardens on our porch because of the real threat of visiting bears. I sneak in some herbs because they’re not vegetables, but the HOA can be persnickety.

  • cogitase@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    122
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Natural gas is used to produce hydrogen, which is then used in the Haber-Bosch process to produce ammonia from nitrogen in the atmosphere. Only about 6% of natural gas is used to produce hydrogen, so even if the price were to rise substantially, we could divert natural gas from other uses and have plenty for making ammonia. We also have other ways of producing hydrogen, it’s just that natural gas is more established.

    PEM electrolyzers paired with cheap solar in countries with high insolation can now produce hydrogen for less than the cost of natural gas, but we’re only recently starting to see the construction of the large-scale green ammonia plants needed to accomplish this. Egypt is currently constructing a 100-MW green ammonia plant powered by solar energy. Even if you didn’t have enough PEM eletrolyzers you could still just pass current through some salt water and produce hydrogen, albeit much less efficiently.

    It’s not going to be a catastrophic issue.

    • fullsquare@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 minutes ago

      Adding to that, logistics are such that direct impact will be felt strongest in places like India that rely heavily on Qatari LNG to make fertilizer, but many places have other sources of both gas and fertilizer. Americas, EU, Russia and China will get by because they have their own supply and will be only affected by price increase

    • OhVenus_Baby@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      It might not be a massive scientific issue but I bet prices will still rise and the news will be fearmongering causing pricing to go up and never come back down. It’s a capitalism issue and corruption and greed.

    • Rusty@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Fun fact: Fritz Haber, the German guy that invented the Haber-Bosch process is the same Fritz Haber that developed a way to use the chlorine gas in chemical warfare. He was personally overseeing its effect in the battle of Ypres.

      • als@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        38
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Clara Immerwahr, who was married to Fritz Haber and was a successful chemist in her own right, spoke out against his research as a “perversion of the ideals of science” and “a sign of barbarity, corrupting the very discipline which ought to bring new insights into life.” She ended her own life the day before he traveled to the eastern front to oversee the use of chlorine gas against Russian troops.

    • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Thank you for explaining the process, because the pro-fuel-cell pact doesn’t understand that hydrogen isn’t free and production is still heavily reliant on fossil fuels.

      “Oh it comes from ammonia”. Alright, where does the ammonia come from???

      You’re just moving the problem around, not fixing anything.

        • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          But why not just make electricity from renewable energy?

          Like, I get the benefit of fuel cells, but people need to realize that hydrogen closer to a battery than a fuel source itself. You’re expending energy now to make storage of energy that can be tapped later.

          It’s good for places where vehicles can’t tap into the grid and need dense energy storage (i.e. transoceanic freighters), or where long charging times are infeasible (like long-range trucking).

          And probably good for grid-level storage, too.

          But for a typical family car/commuter? There’s really no point. You’re adding more steps in energy conversion, and losing efficiency at every additional step (thanks to basic physics), and to gain what? A faster refueling time on a long road trip? An experience closer to what we were used to with ICE-cars? An experience that really isn’t that great anywhere that has a winter. Or an excessively hot summer.

          Maybe for people who can’t have a charger at home, even an L1, but there are better solutions for that (like…adding an outlet? Making landlords responsible for providing power whenever there is parking? More municipal charging locations?)

          • Hypx@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            You can’t store electricity by itself. The problem we are facing is massive curtailment, i.e. massive overproduction of green energy that can’t be utilized. There needs to be way of storing it at a massive scale. There is no feasible way of storing that much energy in conventional batteries.

            If you can acknowledge that hydrogen is needed for dense energy storage and grid-level storage, then you should realize that we will eventually have a huge hydrogen infrastructure, and production capacity to match. That will create very cheap green hydrogen, and will mirror what happened with solar and wind.

            Cheap hydrogen alone will drive large-scale adoption of hydrogen cars, regardless of the popularity of BEVs. A lot of people will choose hydrogen cars (possible e-fuel cars too, since e-fuels can be made from hydrogen) simply because it is akin to an ICE-car in usage.

            The other point is that battery production is not green and is very resource intensive. Hydrogen cars let’s you avoid that almost entirely. In the long-run, it will be pointless to care about efficiency when green energy becomes nearly free. That suggests hydrogen, not batteries, is the better idea.

    • The_v@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Farmers almost uniformly over-apply N fertilizer. Having it be more expensive and forcing them to look into more efficient ways of applying fertilizer and managing nutrients is not a bad thing.

        • The_v@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Farmers are price-takers not price-makers. The prices they receive are driven by speculation on the commodities markets (even for crops not traded on the market).

          Since they can’t control the price they receive for their crop, they are very sensitive to any change in the cost of inputs. Determining how much to spent on inputs is the part of their profitablity they can control. So widespread behavioral change is usually pretty close to immediate.

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      15 hours ago

      we could divert natural gas from other uses and have plenty for making ammonia. We also have other ways of producing hydrogen

      We can’t do any of those in a scale large enough to replace the destruction and have it online for the next planting season on the North Hemisphere. Or the next one on the South Hemisphere either, btw. Or the following ones for each.

  • BastingChemina@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    13 hours ago

    It’s not just fertilizer:

    it takes about 7.3 units of (primarily) fossil energy to produce one unit of food energy

    Assessing the sustainability of the US food system: a life cycle perspective

    With all the fertilizer, heavy equipment and agricultural practices the food production today is very inefficient from an energy perspective.

    Without cheap, abundant energy available the whole food production system is not sustainable

    • kungen@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Exactly. The Swedish government or something did some study recently to determine if we’d be able to be self-sufficient under a longer time if we needed to be, as we currently have a lot of food imports. The conclusion was “yes, but there won’t be as much food diversity”.

      However, they completely ignored the fact that we only have a ~90 days strategic reserve of oil, and that basically all the machining used for farming runs on diesel. And there’s currently no goals to change that.

      If we can’t import or refine diesel anymore, we will starve.

    • Naz@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I’m surprised to see this truth known on the Internet, I guess Lemmy actually is smarter than most other social media out there :o

      • plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        62
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        16 hours ago

        When someone says American, they mean a USA resident. I don’t know anyone who would assume they mean a Canadian and/or Mexican, since you use those terms for them.

        And if you are you’re just being obtuse or argumentative.

          • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            16 hours ago

            Why? You have North Americans and South Americans to cover the others?

            What else would you need to include in the term Americans?

              • PhoenixDog@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                13 hours ago

                North America is Canada and the USA. And there’s also central America, which isn’t included in those two terms.

                Just casually ignoring Mexico as part of North America says everything I need to know about how intelligent you are.

                Name checks out, you’re obtuse.

              • drcobaltjedi@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                15 hours ago

                In English, the correct demonym for a citizen of the United States of America is “American”. There have been others that somewhat are accepted but are not universal like “Yankee” which half the population would take great offense to.

                It isn’t centering the world on us to call ourselves Americans, it’s the only thing that works in the language and is accepted by everyone it applies to. Call a Canadian an “american” and watch how quickly they correct you.

                I’ve seen people propose “United statesian” but there 2 problems with that, first it does not flow well in English, second that doesn’t actually fix the problem since there’s still be ambiguity with people living in the United Mexican States.

              • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                16 hours ago

                The whole world uses that term, since the other countries are covered by other terms, or other encompassing terms like I explained already.

                When someone says American, what country do you think they come from? You just said you know what North Americans are, so you wouldn’t include Canada or single out Canada there.

                American has never meant an all encompassing term for north/central/south America, where the hell did you get this idea from?

              • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                14 hours ago

                What countries have the word “America” in them? How many countries in the Americas are “united States”?
                What do you call a citizen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?

                For the record, The United States of America is the only country with the word America in it’s name. Our immediate neighbor, The United Mexican States, is another country you could, but no one would, plausibly call the United States.

                The British isles contains two countries, Ireland and the UK. One of these is the home of the British, and the other would be much happier if you didn’t call them that.

                Insisting that you not refer to the people of a country by the most unique name in the countries name, because the geographic region has that word in common is … Odd.

              • Luca@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                15 hours ago

                “Central America” is in North America. Racists just pretend it’s not so they don’t have to mentally grapple with brown people natively being on the same continent as themselves.

          • plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            16 hours ago

            Your point being you are making up a new definition and calling everyone else wrong? I also didn’t even notice your username, you’re just being bloody obtuse.

            Bold move cotton.

      • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Wasn’t the CNN just conducting a poll about the Iran invasion and around 100% of maga was for it, and like 35% of democrats too?

        Like insane numbers (am home w bad cold might write errors).

      • Scubus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        America, where there is an actively sitting known pedophile president protecting a group of elite pedophiles

        Well, we’re not trying that hard. Seriously, it takes one person to put an end to all this misery and yet we don’t. Until there’s real progress in the US, it’s safe to say that each and every American supports our presidents actions if nothing else through refusal to stop him.

        • backalleycoyote@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Gonna take a lot more than one person to end it. The president is just the cream of the crap. It’ll take dismantling the power of his cronies, their wealth/businesses, and their supporters. From the billionaires to the paycheck-to-paycheckaires that scream bloody murder when you suggest taxing their heroes to fund the welfare they think they’re entitled to but is a theft when someone else receives it, the problem isn’t just in high offices. It’s living next door to you and will vote this hate in again even if the current regime is removed.

          • Scubus@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            15 hours ago

            Then it would take one more at that point. Solve enough problems and eventually people will realize they need to stop creating them. Or solve your neighbors. As long as someone is ACTUALLY DOING SOMETHING against the biggest problem, the rest of them can wait until someone is ready to solve them. When the biggest issue is dealt with, then we can start solving the smaller ones.

            • backalleycoyote@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              13 hours ago

              Define biggest problem. Is it the figurehead that has been empowered or the culture of hate that empowered it? Removing the head might lessen the impact short term, but not addressing the real issue that is the culture of hate will just send it to ground, breed a sense of victimhood and lost cause, and pass it on until it surfaces again. On the flipside, start killing your MAGA neighbors (which are more easily accessible than the office holders) and you’re just an unhinged lone wolf that won’t get very far before you’re killed or arrested, plus you’re just adding to the narrative that “these are dangerous people that must be eliminated”. It risks everything, gains little, and strengthens them. Scale that up to thousands of people the ing on their neighbors and you’ve moved on to genocide, which even if you win isn’t going to impress the global community. Great, America’s no longer a Christo-fascist oligarchy, all it took was half of them liquidating the other half… And what do you do with the kids? Kill them along with the parents? Send them off to be reindoctrinated? I have a hard time believing someone who watched their parents get murdered over political beliefs is going to have an easy time growing up compliant in the system where their parent’s killers won.

              It’s going to be a mix of fighting, lives and livelihoods getting lost, and consequences like being stripped of the rights to hold offices, own businesses, and vote- things that should have happened to those who participated in the Confederacy- to win. A lot more than one person is going to have to get their hands dirty with the knowledge they might not live to see it through, and it even then what they’ve done will be on their conscience for the remainder of their lives. You ever killed anyone? Ever beaten someone so savagely they had to go to the ER? Even if you can live comfortably with having done it because you feel morally justified, still weighs on you when you consider “goddamn, I beat the ever loving fuck out of that person and don’t feel bad”.

              I’ve found most people aren’t as comfortable with committing violence as they are talking about it or empowering others to do it for them, so I’m not at all surprised we don’t have a lot of lone wolves murdering their MAGA neighbors, just packs of state sanctioned thugs called cops doing it on behalf of their handlers.

              Whatever we do, however we fight back, not one of us alive today is going to get to live in a decent world. We’re here to duke it out for the foundation of what kind of society our grandkids and great grandkids get to live in, and even then they’re going to have to work to preserve their version of it because hate, intolerance, greed, and entitlement always reinvent themselves.