lad

Petrol is for the driver

To me it didn’t read as blaming more like ‘of course people from a different era 250 years ago couldn’t have guessed that, it’s stupid to expect otherwise’

Makes sense. Also agree on the last part

Absolutely, and although they did re-invent Fogbank, it took almost 100 millions, makes me wonder what would it cost to keep the knowledge from disappearing in the first place

For me the comment is still there, weird

You totally can. But it’s better than thorn by a lot

I am left wondering if you mean human-CEO or LLM-CEO here

His economic strategy, too

I wonder if there was no known philosopher with that idea and the question author speaks of themselves in third person 🌚

I feel like a lot of said leaders would be perfectly fine with a positive answer

Probably not, but I also never seen MM used for millions, usually just M as opposed to k used for thousands

Be the change you want to see

I hope that fair and extensive education and a transparent discussion of issues in the society would help. I’m yet to see a society that tries this, so maybe it’s also not going to work

Yeah, it worked really well historically, and with absolutely no negative side effects whatsoever

It’s a long line of ‘you should just protest/vote harder’ countries, unfortunately

Ok, I thought you were being sarcastic at first

That would make for a very unpredictable result, and even as someone who is not that much into wine, I would advise against doing that

Which ones are those two?

I find any use of the same word to mean opposite things confusing, and it seems to happen more often than I would like in the US politics

Yeah, everyone is outraged at being a product when using free services, but then also outraged at paid ones.

I’m a bit suspicious of how they want to implement scoring, I feel like it’s either going to be gamed by users or rigged by owners, but otherwise it looks fine as an idea and as a replacement for xitter