fonix232

Trump did put up a few golden statues of himself so celebrating the losers tracks.

Water isn’t a finite resource, genius.

It’s actually infinitely recycled. You drink, you piss it out. Sure, for your lifespan you will be holding some 50-90kg in your body at any time, but that water goes right back into the ecosystem.

Similarly, any freshwater that goes into the seas and oceans end up circling back into freshwater due to evaporation -> clouds -> rainfall. You know, the water cycle? Third grade science class material?

Furthermore, the right to clear water doesn’t mean one person or groups of people get to hog all the water. It should be based on need - and a person dying of dehydration should always be higher priority than some dumb AI datacenter used by millions of idiots to get wrong answers reinforced…

That’s not what a right to clean drinking water means.

That’s not even what “access to water is a human right” means.

Please stop being a dumbass.

Wasn’t foaming at the mouth his default mode for the past few years anyway?

Everything that touches water

Yep. Just had a “discussion” (can’t really call it that because it immediately devolved into ad hominems from their side) with a MAGA the other day. Quoted them some statistics that they demanded sources for, from a US govt site. Their reply was that unless the data comes from the orange turnip’s temu twitter, or some other MAGA source, they don’t accept it.

Yep. it’s essentially a ridiculous, yet somehow legal racket.

I mean, the prosecutor (?) admitted it on Fox News that they’re trying to trap him into perjuring himself… the whole thing should’ve been shut down at that very point.

That’s been obvious for nearly 26 years now

It’s quite simple - by allowing this type of genAI to take hold and have no guardrails, any and all future allegations against the Epstein class can be dismissed with a “fake news, that’s AI” claim.

And since AI is getting better and better at generating images while getting worse and worse at recognising AI generated content…

$10 says it’s a “repurposed” sex hot and it would’ve taken a whopping week for a more techy student to hack it and say profanities or something similar…

The only thing he’s close to is another rush of diarrhea into his Depends.

Funny thing is that we have multiple examples of these AI fine-tunes backfiring spectacularly.

For example all the Grok fails on Xitter, and Elon promising to fix those results constantly, without any of those sticking.

I think the bigger problem is that there’s a segment of the population that’s gotten so dependent on “AI” (LLM chatbots), they literally can’t learn without it. Even the most mundane things they could’ve easily looked up via a search engine, end up as a question to ChatGPT. And no matter how many times you show them that the chatbot gave insanely wrong results, they’re still going to use it.

It’s incredibly vague still, that’s the problem.

Like, I see, if I wanted to roll my own shitcoin, I can’t publish the source code of it on Codeberg.

But, say, a Blockchain lookup app - technically it’s a cryptocurrency related project, but at the end of the day it’s just an app that connects to a public API and lists data from it. Is it also banned?

Or, I make an open source smart clock, from an LED matrix and an ESP32. This smart clock can link to YouTube/Twitch/etc. for viewer count, to GitHub for project stars/forks, to currency exchanges, and one includes a crypto exchange rate tracker for displaying current mainstream coin valuations (say, the top 5 most used coins). Is this project, since it’s crypto related, banned?

Or let’s say I come up with something blockchain adjacent, that could be utilised for cryptocurrency use… and what if I just publish a new cryptographic approach that then gets used by a new cryptocoin that suddenly becomes famous?

Or if my project uses a cryptographic system that comes from a dependency that was broken out of a cryptocurrency project?

Where do we draw the line of “related”? What level of relationship is allowed with the world of cryptocurrency? What degree of separation is deemed appropriate?

ELI5 why fishing is an issue here?

It isn’t a good likeness. The face is way too big.

He did check his feelings. He felt it would bring millions.

Who woulda thunk the facts over feelings gang would prioritise feelings when it comes to making money?

I’d argue that AI does change things:

• on one hand it increases the percentage of invalid/unusable images. A mis-labeled image is still potentially useful, an image of a toucan in the Arctic isn’t. This means that even large datasets become largely unusable because of the volume of fake images.
• on the other hand any AI picture that slips through, taints the dataset and results in expensive manual cleanup to ensure data is reliable.

And then MAGA turns around and starts complaining about Biden

This is one case of elder abuse I can turn a blind eye to.