Yeah, I skimmed the article. It’s not really relevant. Everything uses technology in some aspect, yet everything isn’t relevant in this community.

Respectfully, how is this relevant to this specific community?

Fair enough.

The investigation proposes the 50cm by 50cm hole in the Ursa Major’s hull would likely have been made by a Barracuda supercavitating torpedo.

Doesn’t seem like it’d be the South Korean one, though. Just doesn’t make a whole lot of sense to me.

What makes you think supercavitating torpedoes are involved at all?

What would a South Korean torpedo two-thirds of the way through development today have anything to do with a Russian ship sinking off the coast of Spain a year and a half ago?

I’d wager this was Ukraine’s handiwork using conventional or drone weapons.

Pausing time would be worse than living forever. I could not imagine a greater torture.

Ain’t no way your FLAC albums are larger than uncompressed WAV. The only >2GB FLAC albums I have are massive compilations with 50+ tracks. They’re smaller than WAV, and that’s at max 700MB per CD. Spot checking, it looks like most of mine are ~500MB per album.

You’re not considering the iPod DAC which is higher quality than most cellphone DACs. Also, thinking 40GB fits 10 FLAC albums is stupid. This isn’t correct even for uncompressed WAV files.

I can’t imagine putting this much effort into complaining about someone using their media player of choice. People like vinyl and even cassettes because they’re a different experience, do you write up paragraphs about that too?

That’s regurgitation is how they transmit disease. Fuck mosquitoes.

I don’t see this as tipping, more like a commission. If I don’t have to decide, it isn’t tipping. The only issue I see is it makes the items seem 20% cheaper than they actually are.

What’s the difference between a $120 check that has wages factored into menu prices and a $100 check with a $20 service charge? They’re both $120.

Female astronauts could accidentally get impregnated by stray fluids.

New fetish unlocked

Not the ones with Broadcom chips.

I believe you’re mistaking my criticism of the article for support of Israel or the United States.

When I asked where you’re getting your info, that was a rhetorical question. The point of that was to show that the article that is linked in this thread is poorly written. I’ve read better OSINT analysis on Twitter threads.

Yes, radars were destroyed. No, there’s no analysis in the article to indicate that destroying these radars changed the course of war as they claim in the headline. This makes it a shitty article imo.

That’s not even in the article. The entire point I’m making is this is a poorly written article. Try again.

Where are you getting all that info? It isn’t in the article which is my entire point. Don’t mistake my criticism of the poorly written article as support of one side or the other.

If a radar was down you’d see missing coverage over a relatively large area, not random missiles getting through here and there. No, I don’t think it’s a reasonable conclusion, I think it’s a bad article.

Does the headline say “may” or does it make an explicit claim?

Nothing in the article contradicts the headline, true. There’s also nothing in the article supporting it.

The article’s headline isn’t supported by the text in the article.

The more worrisome reality is that gaps in Israel’s air defenses may be detection (rather than interception) failures resulting from damage to the radars and sensors that underlie the integrated air defense network shared by the United States, Israel, and Gulf partners. If true, the implications would be dire.

“May” and “if true” do not mean the radars that have been destroyed have changed the course of war as they claim in the headline.

I find it much more plausible that we’re simply seeing the effect of increased Iranian missile volume. Even if a system is successful 90% of the time, that’s still going to let through a lot of projectiles if the volume ramps up.

Anyone know where can I actually read what excerpts they released?

One square is the optimal waffle if you’re optimizing for syrup volume alone.