Surprising absolutely no one except the subset of Americans who somehow think that Russia is their friend. Unfortunately that subset still includes their idiot president.

deleted by creator

Actually… pushes up glasses… the word shot is Middle English and describes the flinging of a projectile, including from a bow. It predates the use of gunpowder weaponry and derives from the Old English gesceot.

That’s because it was written at a time when nobles were considered the only natural choice of leadership class, so you’ve got military forces being lead by people with zero practical military knowledge. It’s literally meant to be babies first strategy and logistics guide. Sun Tzu is intentionally dumbing shit down for his audience.

More circular financing. Definitely a sign that everything is going great.

The murders will continue until compliance improves.

This article is seriously underselling the problem.

Yes, all of this is accurate, and its good data for people fighting back against data centres. They produce shockingly few jobs, and the most highly paid of those will likely be experts moved in from elsewhere.

But there’s a far bigger problem; AI data centres have no path to profitability. The cost of GPUs is so astronomically high and the depreciation so insanely fast that even if 3,000 - 4,000 data centres worth of AI compute demand materializes (it won’t; companies like Meta are already selling their own unused compute because demand is so weak), they still won’t be profitable, ever.

The article talks about how the permanent employment offered - on paper - is in the tens to low hundreds and that’s true, but the real employment is mostly going to be zero. In five years time 99% of these projects will be abandoned before completion, or turned into skate parks.

After all, a broken clock is only ever accidentally correct, and never in a way that’s helpful.

I hate this, and I hate that it’s becoming the new normal everywhere.

“Yes, we’ve had one, but what about Second War?”

“I don’t think he knows about Second War, Pippin.”

Sure. And if Christians actually studied the Bible they’d know that. But they don’t.

Wouldn’t it be “Gosh dang it”? Hank is a good Christian boy, he doesn’t take the Lord’s name in vain.

Lemmy.ml in shambles.

Though many GOP senators warn against blowing up the filibuster and empowering a potential future Democratic-led Senate from more easily pushing through their priorities, others, like Trump ally Sen. Ron Johnson, argue that Democrats would nuke the filibuster on their own.

Oh to live in a world where the Dems have even half the guts that Republicans think they do.

I have no idea if that is the official policy

That’s OK. I do.

Like I said, you’re right, though the change was recent enough that I hadn’t been aware of it until I double checked.

You’re wrong about the reasons why the posture changed, but I really can’t get into that.

So, apparently you are actually correct, although the change in posture is much more recent than you think. As in, within the last few weeks to months.

I will not be saying more on this because I’ll get people in trouble if I do.

There are gaps, but those gaps can be fixed. There’s a reason Saab are getting so many orders for GlobalEye.

The issue is that everyone thinks computers operate on magic, so they just ignore the idea that there might be practical limitations on doing the things that they want to do.

In reality there is no means of age verification that isn’t also a form of identity verification. And if you asked people “Should everyone have to hand over their government ID to private companies in order to use the internet”, you’d see much lower numbers of positive responses.

Correct. Even with Operation Reassurance, which stations a sizeable contingent of NATO forces in all three states, the NATO assumption is that the Baltics will be largely overrun by any Russian attack before reinforcements can arrive. The strategic goals of the operation are a) to slow any Russian incursion down, and b) to ensure that an attack on any Baltic state would be a direct engagement with a large portion of NATO militaries, thus ensuring that it would constitute an article 5 trigger. As the name suggests, it’s more about reassurance - “We stand with these people and will fight to defend them” - than it is about actually stopping a Russian attack.

Edit: As of very recently this is no longer true. See below.

I’d suggest that you try saying this to someone in Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia or Poland, but I don’t actually want you to get punched out.