Seriously. Its on the level of delusion of the super stonk bros covered in “This is Financial Advice”.

Can yall please pretty please stop fucking supporting horrible regimes and then also trying to use them as examples of socialism? You’re not helping anyone. You’re literally only hurting the appearance of socialism.

Its like you don’t get that you actually have to sell people on the idea. You certainly won’t convince people with bashing people over the head with delusional or pedantic at best history rewritings/retellings about horrible people.

Those people were bad, socialism is good. Separate the ideas. Everything is better this way.

Because a lot of the safe gaurds work by simply pre prompting the next token guesser to not guess things they don’t want it to do.

Its in plain english using the “logic” of conversations, so the same vulnerabilities largely apply to those methods.

Don’t forget the single digit millions that pretended that the mentally incompetent rapist fascist was the same as a generic corporatist neoliberal and encouraged people to stay home.

I gotta be real with you. This comment very much sounds like the delusional super stonk member who think eventually the big system they believe is colluding to fuck them trips up on a technicality and makes them uber rich.

Basically, you’re just imagining a reality that wont exist for so many reasons.

The biggest reason is that the AI GPUs do not use DIMMs largely, and even server dimms (ecc rdimms) won’t fit in your PC.

More than that, by the time anything does happen, technology will have moved on.

If you’re about to say “but I don’t have to”, Id ask you why you arent on a 10 year old computer right now.

The fact people are blaming the tech rather than the tech bros is a big part of why this keeps happening.

Its the decision of real people that make this situation suck.

Its always been a shitty meme aimed at being cruel to new users.

Somehow though people continue to spread the lie that the linux community is nice and welcoming.

Really its a community of professionals, professional elitists, or people who are otherwise so fringe that they demand their os be fringe as well.

What part about mentioning 3 specific projects as examples of where Europe is not doing enough makes you think that I am not aware of their efforts?

I am specifically saying those efforts are not enough nor are they soon enough.

Just to be clear, your point and argument, are that I am correct, but I am wrong because exactly as I mentioned, Europe could have done better if they bolstered their defences and prepared?

It feels like you’ve just taken my comment as an attack on Europe, but have no real criticisms of my points.

My statement would be less true, not more true in 2023, because the point is, the longer they go without having done so, the more dire the situation becomes.

Given that Europe has had 4 years to start cranking up its military power and has failed to do so meaningfully, and the US looks like a vassal state of Russia at the moment, I feel this may become an inevitability if Europeans don’t stop bickering about where exactly gets to make what, and starts actually making things, like with the 2 modern fighter projects (as Europe cannot make its own 5th yet alone 6th gen fighters), or the joint European (France and Germany mainly) tank project.

I feel like some of the people here should consider why we all know she would vote the same way if an election was held immediately after making this post.

They are getting something that they desire more than lower grocery costs or anything sane things any sane person would value.

They are getting to hurt marginalized people with their votes.

This is their single voter issue, and its the reason why no matter how much they’ve shot themselves in the foot, they’ll buy that 500 dollar advil their insurance denied coverage for and load up another shell.

They don’t evaluate politicians based on if they’re happy. They evaluate politicians based on if who they hate feel sad.

That was based on military contributions, but as the commenter below points out it turns out the situation is even worse than what I described rather than better unless I read that wrong?

Because Europe has had half a decade to fill the void and they can’t get it done and continue to act like cost efficiency is the name of the game.

Europeans seem to want to rag on about the US being irrelevant while being completely unwilling to put their money where their mouths are.

I am very supportive of Europe, but they need to wake up to that reality and stop bickering about pennies.

They should have been at wartime production years ago, and yet they still don’t even have a 5th let alone 6th gen fighter jet.

The fact that the USA, who is currently chopping its own legs off, is managing to provide just about equally to the Ukrainian war effort to you, who are literally neighbours, should be embarrassing and sobering, but instead people just keep complaining and expecting the US to both shut up, and fix it.

My comment was particular in what it was in response to.

I quoted the section of your comment that was relevant:

After using KDE, even powertoys look basic to me.

After using KDE, even powertoys look basic to me.

I think this is quite a bit exaggerated no? KDE lacks many of the tools Powertoys adds like the OCR, advanced clipboard, colour picker and more.

Also, yes, pinning windows on top exists.

It should be noted that they were never actually their nukes (not their codes or delivery systems), but that this would have been a good time for them to make their own nukes.

Right, it would be done before the US invades, to prevent them from invading. Nuclear weapons are deterrence, you don’t want to actually use them.

I fear my point is being missed.

My point was in response mainly to this last sentence:

I do think a nuclear deterrent would be ideal, but that’s a couple of steps of escalation further down the line I think.

My point is that it cant be further down, because if you are down that far, its too late. We’ve seen this was most countries that became under the gun when they would benefit dearly from having nuclear weapons of their own.

Notably, if Ukraine did so before they would have been fine, but during, they have no chance.

Iran similarly has a difficult time.

Its not about the nation, its about the fact that if you are at a point where you feel the heat is on, its too late to build nukes. Now is the time to build them.

Hitler didn’t get as far as he did due to a lack of military buildup and militarism among European nations what are talking about?

He absolutely did. That, and concession after concession to appease that which cannot be appeased. He got very far because people kept at it with the “lets just be reasonable here” sentiments that only work if your opponent operates logically like a machine or even a traditional bureaucracy.

He got as far as he did because Britain and allies didn’t see him as a threat because they had no problems with either his domestic policies and his beginning foreign conquests weren’t deal breaking or a true threat to their power.

???

They most definitely thought he was a threat, but one they could contain without force and through appeasement.

Not sure exactly what you’re getting at especially as the quotes around free could mean a number of things, most of which I agree with.

I don’t disagree at all, hence my conclusion that if neither is effective we must do what is:

the most important thing we could possibly do this decade, is to internally create our own ultimate strategic deterrents