• Paragone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’m not tying to restrict you from using stuff that helps bypass disability.

    I’m trying to have more-likely-to-kill-someone behaviors more-licensed.

    Ignore that distinction if your ideology wants…

    _ /\ _

    • forestbeasts@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      No, what you’re doing is tying people’s speed to what their specific body can produce rather than what is safe. Those are two very different things.

      • Paragone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        Not what I meant:

        I’m tying power to the power that the bicyclist can naturally produce.

        I’m tying speed to licensing-level, because crash-energy goes up with the square of the speed.

        Physically-weak? THEN small-motor.

        Linebacker? THEN huge-motor.

        Speeds are tied to licensing.

        I’m not tying speed to body-force, I’m tying it to licensing-level/competence-carefulness.

        Don’t know how I fucked-up the communication so bad, but sorry.

        _ /\ _

        • forestbeasts@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Okay, but you’re still talking like tying power to people’s body energy output is a good thing. Speed, power, whatever, limiting our machine capability just because our body is limited (preventing working around disability) is an asshole move.